On some mechanical characteristics of the ballast in assessing the stress-strain behaviour of railway tracks
https://doi.org/10.46684/2023.2.3
Abstract
On the basis of recent research, a review has been carried out on the experimental determination of the mechanical parameters of the materials used as ballast material. Considerable attention is given to the well-founded selection of input data for the calculation, i. e. quantitative characteristics of the elastic properties of the materials used to form the ballast layer, which is treated as a continuous medium. It appears that this approach makes it possible to assess correctly the influence of grain (grain size distribution) distribution, ballast layer thickness and material type on the stability of a railway track to vertical and horizontal disturbances. The data of this review show that material properties and particle size have a signifi cant impact on elastic moduli and in finite-element modelling of static strength problems, grain-size distribution and material properties are only taken into account through these moduli. Experimental results show a non-linear dependence of the elastic moduli on the stress behaviour of the ballast prism, which is related to a densifi cation of the medium in compression. However, it is established that, after a suffi ciently large number of loading cycles, the medium can be treated as linearly elastic. In general, the results of the research allow establishing requirements for damping, geometric and granulometric parameters of the ballast prism.
About the Authors
V. I. SmirnovRussian Federation
Vladimir I. Smirnov, Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Associate Professor, Professor
Department of “Mechanics and Strength of Materials and Structures”
190031
9 Moskovsky pr.
St. Petersburg
S. A. Vidyushenkov
Russian Federation
Sergey A. Vidyushenkov, Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department
Department of “Mechanics and Strength of Materials and Structures”
190031
9 Moskovsky pr.
St. Petersburg
References
1. Chrismer S. M. Consideration of factors affecting ballast performance. AREA, Bulletin 704 AAR Research and Test Department Report N. WP-110. 1985; 118-150.
2. Jeffs T., Marich S. Ballast characteristics in the laboratory. Proceedings of a Conference on Railway Engineering. 1987; 141-147.
3. Indraratna B., Ionescu D., Christie D. State-of-the-art large scale testing of ballast. Proceedings of CORE 2000. Railway Technology for the 21<sup>st</sup> Century, Conference on Railway Engineering. 2000; 24. 1-24. 13.
4. Esweld C. Modern Railway track. 2<sup>nd</sup> edn. Zaltbommel, MRT Productions, 2001; 632.
5. Jacobson L. User element for ABAQUS designed to represent ballast resistance. SP Technical Notes: 12, Swedish National Testing and Research Institute. 2005; 9.
6. Chang C. S., Adegoke C. W., Selig E. T. GEOTRACK Model for Railroad Truck Performance. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division. 1980; 106 (11): 1201-1218. DOI: 10.1061/ajgeb6.0001059
7. Mohammadi M., Karabalis D. L. Dynamic 3-D soil–railway track interaction by BEM–FEM. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 1995; 24 (9): 1177-1193. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290240902
8. Adam М., Pflanz G., Schmid G. Two- and three-dimensional modelling of half-space and train-track embankment under dynamic loading. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2000; 19 (8): 559-573. DOI: 10.1016/s0267-7261(00)00068-3
9. Monismith C. L., Seed H. B., Mitry F. G., Chan C. K. Predictions of pavement deflections from laboratory tests. Second International Conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements. 1967; 53-88.
10. Li D., Selig E. T. Method for Railroad Track Foundation Design. I: Development. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 1998; 124 (4): 316-322. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(1998)124:4(316)
11. Kempfert H. G., Vogel W. Grundsatzfragen des Erd- und Grundbaus für Hochgeschwindigkeits-strecken. AET Archiv für Eisenbahntechnik, 44, Ingenieursbauwerke de Neubaustrecken der Deutsche Bundesbahn. 1992; 11-38.
12. Raymond G. P. Design for railroad ballast and subgrade support. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division. 1978; 104 (1): 45-60. DOI: 10.1061/ajgeb6.0000576
13. Selig E. T., Waters J. M. Track Geotechnology and Substructure Management. Thomas Telford, 1994. DOI: 10.1680/tgasm.20139
14. Alva-Hurtado J. E., Selig E. T. Permanent strain behavior of railroad ballast. Proceedings of The International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 10<sup>th</sup>. 1981; 1: 543-546.
15. Raymond G. P., Davies J. R. Triaxial tests on dolomite railroad ballast. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division. 1978; 104 (6): 737-751. DOI: 10.1061/ajgeb6.0000646
16. Lambe T. W., Whitman R. V. Soil Mechanics, SI Version. John Wiley and Sons, 1979; 145-159.
17. Janardhanam R., Desai C. S. Three‐Dimensional Testing and Modeling of Ballast. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 1983; 109 (6: 783-796. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1983)109:6(783)
18. Vermeer P. A., Schanz T. Evaluation of soil stiffness parameters. ASCE Workshop on Computational Geotechnics. University of Colorado, Boulder. 1998; 5.
19. Kaya M., Jernigan R., Runesson K., Sture S. Reproducibility and conventional triaxial tests on ballast material. Technical Report, Department of Civil Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado at Boulder, Colorado, USA, 1997; 1: 43; 2: 40.
20. Anderson W. F., Fair P. Behavior of Railroad Ballast under Monotonic and Cyclic Loading. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 2008; 134 (3): 316-327. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2008)134:3(316)
21. Indraratna B., Ionescu D., Christie H. D. Shear behavior of railway ballast based on large-scale triaxial tests. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 1998; 124 (5) 439-449. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(1998)124:5(439)
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Smirnov V.I., Vidyushenkov S.A. On some mechanical characteristics of the ballast in assessing the stress-strain behaviour of railway tracks. BRIСS Transport. 2023;2(2):1-7. https://doi.org/10.46684/2023.2.3