Selection of railway track superstructure design: Modern outlooks

   The paper analyses the reasons for the current opinion that a higher mass of superstructure elements is necessary for railway track sections with higher traffi c density, speed and axial loads. With the help of known theories and the new one developed by the author that takes into account the time factor, it is proved that in terms of all the most signifi cant technical indicators the best solution within the realistic limits is to use lower-mass rails and reinforced concrete sleepers. The most essential argument in favour of the smaller mass of rails per unit length is the increased track stability produced by longitudinal compressive forces in rails. A reinforced concrete sleeper of a smaller mass has been proposed and tested that increases the resistance to shear in ballast across the track axis at least two times. For stable pressing of rails to sleepers by intermediate fasteners, elastic clips should be made of plate steel instead of bar steel. It is proposed to make a plate clip shaped as a ‘fish-bellied beam’. Specific examples of the proposed solutions for rails, reinforced concrete sleepers, and intermediate fastenings are given.

1. Shakhunyants G.M. Technical and economic calculations in the track management of railways. Moscow, Transzheldorizdat, 1939;242. (In Russ.).

2. Shakhunyants G.M. Railway track. Moscow, Transport, 1969;536. (In Russ.).

3. Shakhunyants G.M. Railway track. Moscow, Transport, 1987;479. (In Russ.).

4. Novakovich V.I. Continuous track with extra-long rail strands : tutorial. Moscow, FSBI DPO “Training and Methodological Center for Education in Railway Transport”, 2017;165. (In Russ.).

5. Pershin S.P. Methods for calculating the stability of a seamless track. Proceedings of MIIT. Moscow, 1962;147:28-96. (In Russ.).

6. Novakovich V.I. Rheology of jointless tracks. Rail International. 1988;19(11):35-41. EDN: XLQSUC.

7. Khvostik M. Railway rails of R75 type: historical background and perspectives. Railway Track and Facilities. 2023;8:2-6. EDN: MDWLNB. (In Russ.).

8. Shur E.A. Damage to rails. Moscow, Intext, 2012;192. (In Russ.).

9. Railway transport, encyclopedia. Moscow, Great Russian Encyclopedia, 1994;559. (In Russ.).

10. Novakovich V.I., Karpachevsky G.V. On the methodology for calculating the strength of weldless track rails. Track and Track Management. 2015;7:25-26. EDN: UBVPCF. (In Russ.).

11. Bromberg E.M., Verigo M.F., Danilov V.N., Frishman M.A. Interaction of track and rolling stock. Proceedings of VNIIZhT. Moscow, Transzheldorizdat, 1956. (In Russ.).

12. Novakovich V., Mironenko Ye., Khadukaev N. Does the mass of the sleeper affect the shear resistance in the ballast? Railway Track and Facilities. 2020;3:34-37. EDN: TZNKZA. (In Russ.).

13. Karpachevsky V.V., Kireevnin A.A., Babadeev I.S. Design of a new reinforced concrete sleeper. Railway Track and Facilities. 2010;5:31. EDN: KSEJIN. (In Russ.).

14. Patent RU No. 2688650. Elastic boltless rail fastening / Novakovich V.I., Novakovich O.V., Novakovich V.S.; publ. 05/21/2019. Bull. No. 15.